What we do, in detail

Management consultancy, the two-month clock, distributions, and board discipline.

Program 01 · Where you stand

Management consultancy

Most advice given to a struggling business is given before anyone has established where it actually stands, which is how companies end up restructuring the wrong thing. We look at the position on both tests the law cares about, the balance sheet and the twelve-month cash horizon, and write down what we find including the parts nobody wants to read. It is commercial advice, not legal or accounting advice, and we will say when a question belongs with your lawyer.

  • Per engagement
  • Both tests applied
  • Written findings
  • Commercial advice

Start this program

Step 1 · The numbers

What the accounts actually show.

Step 2 · The cash

Twelve months out, honestly.

Step 3 · The trigger

Whether either test is met.

Step 4 · The options

Including the unwelcome ones.

Step 1 · The date

When it was, or should have been, seen.

Step 2 · The meeting

Convened inside two months.

Step 3 · The report

Reasoned, not a formality.

Step 4 · The record

Minuted so it can be shown.

Program 02 · It starts early

The two-month clock

The clock runs from when the situation was established or ought to have been established, which means it can already be running while nobody has noticed. Within two months the board must convene the general meeting and put a reasoned special report to it, proposing dissolution or measures to restore the position. Miss it and damage suffered by third parties is presumed to flow from the failure, so the director is disproving causation rather than the claimant proving it.

  • Per engagement
  • Clock identified
  • Report drafted with advisers
  • Minutes kept

Start this program

Program 03 · Two tests again

Distributions

A Belgian limited liability company no longer has capital in the old sense, and a distribution has to pass two cumulative tests: net assets, and whether the company will still be able to pay its debts as they fall due over at least the following twelve months. Directors are jointly and severally liable for a distribution made in breach of the liquidity test. It is one of the few places in company law where getting it wrong reaches a director's own pocket directly.

  • Per decision
  • Both tests documented
  • Reasoning retained
  • Not tax advice

Start this program

Step 1 · The proposal

What is to be distributed.

Step 2 · Net assets

The first test, applied.

Step 3 · Liquidity

Twelve months, written down.

Step 4 · The record

Kept, because it may be asked for.

Step 1 · Declare

Before the deliberation, not after.

Step 2 · Record

In the minutes, with reasons.

Step 3 · Abstain

No part in deliberation or vote.

Step 4 · Retain

So it can be produced later.

Program 04 · Especially alone

Board discipline

A director with a conflicting financial interest must say so before the deliberation, have it recorded, and stay out of the vote. And the liability cap in the Code is narrower than people assume: it does not apply to repeated minor fault, serious fault, fraudulent intent, or certain tax and social security debts. Where there is a single director, no colleague is going to catch the missed step, so the discipline has to be deliberate rather than social.

  • Ongoing
  • Conflicts minuted
  • Records kept
  • Cap not a shelter

Start this program

Want to know where a business actually stands?

A free first conversation, with no obligation.