Step 1 · The numbers
What the accounts actually show.
Management consultancy, the two-month clock, distributions, and board discipline.
Most advice given to a struggling business is given before anyone has established where it actually stands, which is how companies end up restructuring the wrong thing. We look at the position on both tests the law cares about, the balance sheet and the twelve-month cash horizon, and write down what we find including the parts nobody wants to read. It is commercial advice, not legal or accounting advice, and we will say when a question belongs with your lawyer.
What the accounts actually show.
Twelve months out, honestly.
Whether either test is met.
Including the unwelcome ones.
When it was, or should have been, seen.
Convened inside two months.
Reasoned, not a formality.
Minuted so it can be shown.
The clock runs from when the situation was established or ought to have been established, which means it can already be running while nobody has noticed. Within two months the board must convene the general meeting and put a reasoned special report to it, proposing dissolution or measures to restore the position. Miss it and damage suffered by third parties is presumed to flow from the failure, so the director is disproving causation rather than the claimant proving it.
A Belgian limited liability company no longer has capital in the old sense, and a distribution has to pass two cumulative tests: net assets, and whether the company will still be able to pay its debts as they fall due over at least the following twelve months. Directors are jointly and severally liable for a distribution made in breach of the liquidity test. It is one of the few places in company law where getting it wrong reaches a director's own pocket directly.
What is to be distributed.
The first test, applied.
Twelve months, written down.
Kept, because it may be asked for.
Before the deliberation, not after.
In the minutes, with reasons.
No part in deliberation or vote.
So it can be produced later.
A director with a conflicting financial interest must say so before the deliberation, have it recorded, and stay out of the vote. And the liability cap in the Code is narrower than people assume: it does not apply to repeated minor fault, serious fault, fraudulent intent, or certain tax and social security debts. Where there is a single director, no colleague is going to catch the missed step, so the discipline has to be deliberate rather than social.
A free first conversation, with no obligation.